Patriot Group to Build a 3,000 Acre Armed Compound

Fortified community that will have 10-20,000 armed residents

Fortified community that will have 10-20,000 armed residents

Zachary Cole

TyrannyWatch.org

January 15, 2013

There has been a lot of talk about gun control, the second amendment, and how to approach tragedies involving firearms in the United States. Some suggested that we ban certain guns or outlaw them flat out. Others say that gun control is the problem and instead we should arm up more citizens. However, some people have formed a solution outside of the typical narrative.

A patriot group called the Citadel is laying the groundwork to construct a 3,000 acre city in western Idaho (Benewah County) that will be able to accommodate 3,500- 7,000 families. The city could potentially have a population of 10- 20,000 people if the average household has three. According to the group over 200 families have already signed up for the project and this was before they even advertised the community. The Citadel also says that they will be purchasing the land this year and will be breaking ground soon after that.

The fortified city will not only be in a remote area but will be upon a mountain or a raised area of land. The project map of the compound shows an outer and inner wall with corresponding gates, inner and outer defensive towers, perimeter housing, neighborhoods, power and water stations, farmers market, an amphitheater, schools, firearms Museum, reflecting pool, a firearms factory, and the town center in which I guess is going to be for communal purposes.

The main emphasis of the group is to “voluntarily choose to live together in accordance with Thomas Jefferson’s ideal of rightful liberty.” The obvious motivation of this project is to build “an armed community to protect their liberty” from an oppressive government. The Citadel website also states the main ideals that potential residents should have in common are “patriotism, pride in American exceptionalism, our proud history of liberty as defined by our founding Fathers, and physical preparedness to survive and prevail in the face of natural catastrophes…or man-made catastrophes.”

The Citadel says that the community is open to all (i.e. races) as long as people share their common ideals and causes. The fortified city also aims to provide privacy for its residents and tourists in particular will not be able to see within the community (although they will not be barred from visiting). Another feature that the project has is the three-part application process that serves to gauge the compatibility of each family to the community. Their website says, “Approved applicants receive a lifetime lease (paid off in only 30 years). No credit check. No background check. Zero down payment. Zero property taxes.”

Once a family becomes a part of the Citadel, they may take a voluntary pledge “to follow the footsteps of our founding fathers by swearing to one another our lives, our fortunes and sacred honor to defend one another and liberty against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” It should be duly noted that just as families are free to live there, they’re also free to leave at anytime. This has to be mentioned since some may immediately associate this with a cult compound like Jonestown or Waco.

While I like the idea of creating a self sustainable community with others who have common interests, it’s hard not to think of the Ruby Ridge Massacre which just so happen to have taken place in Idaho. Randy and Vicki Weaver also had ideas of separating from society and preparing for an apocalyptic scenario. Although what happened at Ruby Ridge didn’t involve a huge number of people, it did have some similarities in regards to location, a descent amount of land, and hostilities towards any encroachment of liberties.

It will be interesting to see how this community develops and if it is a success or not. Of course, there are already leftwing Democrats types using the typical meme of “racism” and “preservation of white America” to scare off people from living in a communal setting similar to this. I have no problem with forming communities with like-minded people (although there should be safeguards from xenophobia). It is clear, at least on paper, that the city is not being built to separate the races but rather is an attempt to distance themselves from the long arm of the Federal government. Whether one likes their views or not is irrelevant, many people of diverse backgrounds in the US are considering the idea of building their own communities. Anyone that has their hand to the plow and their ears to the ground will tell you that.

Advertisements

Feinstein’s Anti-Gun Witch Hunt

1500_bushmaster

Zachary Cole

Tyranny watch.org

December 28, 2012

The last couple years have been a major milestone in the process of disarming the public. The attack on the Second Amendment has come directly from the US government through the operation of Fast and Furious; the UN Arms Trade Treaty, and the unfortunate opportunism through the mass shootings of Aurora and Newtown that have occurred in the latter part of 2012.

Of course this has not been without a political circus that the Obama administration has not taken advantage of. After all Rahm Emanuel said, “We can’t let a crisis go to waste.” (Hilary Clinton said similar things as well.) We have even seen the false left-right paradigm exposed in recent shootings because of the hand-in-hand approach that the Democrats and Republicans have displayed on national television. While posing as different, they have actually come out and truly shown their colors. This only proves once again that they are behind the scenes working on similar goals. While publically entertaining the masses with their disagreements on secondary issues.

We have crazies like Rep. Donna Edwards from Maryland who said, “The Second Amendment is important…But we gotta get the guns.” We also have retiring Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas say, “It’s the semiautomatics and those large magazines that can be fired off very quickly. I think that does need to be looked at.” Thankfully Hutchison will not be able to vote for any upcoming assault weapons ban bill this year.

Fast-forward to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, who is set to introduce a bill on the first day of Congress that will officially ban assault weapons. She has been quoted as saying, “Who needs these military style assault weapons? Who needs an ammunition feeding device capable of holding 100 rounds?” Concerning the specifics of the bill, last Sunday on Meet the Press she said, “It will ban the sale, the transfer, the importation and possession, not retroactively, but prospectively, and ban the sale of clips of more than 10 bullets…The purpose of this bill is to get…weapons of war off the streets.”

What Feinstein and her legislation failed to clarify is that although people who already possess assault weapons that are targeted within this bill would be grandfathered in, it actually requires the same citizens to register their guns, provide a photo ID of them, and submit their fingerprints. This would not only eliminate the private sell of guns but would also create a potential list of “threats” to the federal government. This is not unlike the suggestion last week of some, that people on prescription drugs for mental illness should be registered. This can only lead to pre-crime measures and certainly tighter profiling on American citizens (which most civil rights activists have been against concerning race).

By the way, Sen. Feinstein is the same politician that presented an updated amendment for the NDAA that fooled a lot of people into believing that the indefinite detention measure have been corrected and would finally put to bed the issue of American citizens being disappeared without a trial or jury. Of course, this was far from the truth and certainly this assault weapons bill will have the legalese the federal government needs to incrementally ban all guns.

To go back to what Feinstein said, I will attempt to answer her questions according to what the founders of the Constitution actually meant by the Second Amendment. First and foremost, the Second Amendment was not for hunting. In fact, it wasn’t really even for defending yourself against common criminals. The founders expressly said that it was for defending the US citizens against tyrants in the federal government. It was for our defense militarily against a tyrannical system. Even Thomas Jefferson, no matter what you thought of him in his personal life, spoke of the dangers of becoming comfortable in our freedoms because if we did not have a revolution every few decades we can almost guarantee our enslavement.

Why do US citizens need “military style assault weapons”? It is because we need similar or equal power to defend ourselves against an out-of-control government and/or police state. Who needs “ammunition feeding device capable holding 100 rounds”? It is the general public that still believes in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It is the average citizen that still believes in the validity of the Declaration of Independence. For the federal government is not our rulers but we are theirs and according to those that founded this form of governance, it is also our right to remove the corruption at any time.

As Barack Obama and the treasonous Gun Control Committee convene in this next month, let us all turn up the heat on those that seek to steal our rights. Call your local congressperson or your senators and tell them that they are politically done if they seek to put more restrictions on our Second Amendment rights. Assemble other people in your area that are pro-Second Amendment that would be willing to go to your State Capital or local federal buildings and have lawful pro-gun assemblies. Create a committee that would be willing to put together a pro-gun rally in which people could speak on the facts of gun free zones, violent crime statistics, and the historical dangers of disarming the public and its correlation to democide.

The time is now to get serious about our rights or slowly but surely they will be decimated. It’s easier to incrementally take away our right than it is to take large swaths of freedoms away. We only have to look at the patriot act and all the draconian legislation that has been passed since 9/11 to get an idea of what the future of the Second Amendment will be like. But if you like the direction in which this country is going, then let the words of Samuel Adams be the voice of reason to your descendents, “If you love wealth more than liberties, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”

TW Radio Archives Interview With Laura Bernal of American Resolution

American Resolution

Tyranny Watch Podcast #5 – In this week’s episode Zachary talks with Laura Bernal the founder of the American Resolution. We also discuss the movement to merge all people who fight for liberty and freedom under one banner.

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN OR DOWNLOAD

Timeless 4th of July Message

Declaration of Independence

Wouldn’t it be appropriate to read the ”Declaration of Independence” on Independence Day? Is there any similarities between what is said in this document and what is happening in the United States today? Read here:

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.


The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:

Column 1
Georgia:
Button Gwinnett
Lyman Hall
George Walton

Column 2
North Carolina:
William Hooper
Joseph Hewes
John Penn
South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge
Thomas Heyward, Jr.
Thomas Lynch, Jr.
Arthur Middleton

Column 3
Massachusetts:
John Hancock
Maryland:
Samuel Chase
William Paca
Thomas Stone
Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe
Richard Henry Lee
Thomas Jefferson
Benjamin Harrison
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton

Column 4
Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris
Benjamin Rush
Benjamin Franklin
John Morton
George Clymer
James Smith
George Taylor
James Wilson
George Ross
Delaware:
Caesar Rodney
George Read
Thomas McKean

Column 5
New York:
William Floyd
Philip Livingston
Francis Lewis
Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
Richard Stockton
John Witherspoon
Francis Hopkinson
John Hart
Abraham Clark

Column 6
New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett
William Whipple
Massachusetts:
Samuel Adams
John Adams
Robert Treat Paine
Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins
William Ellery
Connecticut:
Roger Sherman
Samuel Huntington
William Williams
Oliver Wolcott
New Hampshire:
Matthew Thornton