The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen?


It would seem that the once thought mythical group called Bilderberg is being pushed out of the shadows into the realm of fact. It was only a couple of decades ago that the Bilderberg group was nothing more then a conspiracy theory but with the onslaught of investigative journalists and zealous activists, we have seen them slowly unmask.

In nineteen-hundred and fifty-two, this elitist group began as the brainchild of Dr. J.H. Retinger who wanted to improve relations between America and Western Europe. Due to the post-war distrust and suspicion among the Western Allies, Retinger contacted Prince Bernhard, Dr. Paul Rykens, and Paul van Zeeland to create an unofficial and private conference composed of influential people in the fields of government, religion, finances, industry, unions, and scholastics to address the issues of economics, politics, and defense. He also contacted Mr. Hugh Gaitskell, Major-General Sir Colin Gubbins, Mr. Ole Bjorn Kraft, Guy Mollet, Dr Rudolf Mueller, Antoine Pinay, M. P. Pipinelis, Max Brauer, Marshal of the R.A.F. Lord Portal of Hungerford, Ambassador Quaroni, and Signor de Gasperi.

By 1954, in Arnhem, Holland the very first conference convened at the Bilderberg Hotel, from which the group gets its name. The first chair to preside was Paul van Zeeland, while later in the international meetings the chair would rotate. Eventually, they decided that one chair should conduct the meeting and Prince Bernhard was installed into that position. They also formed European and American “Steering Committees” which especially interested both the Democrats and Republicans in the US. On the European committee were Signor Amintore Fanfan, Sir Terence Airey, Mr. Jens Christian Hauge, Mr. D. Healey, Mr. E. N. van Kleffens, Mr. Reginald Maudling, Mr. Alfred Robens, Professor Carlo Schmid, and Mr. Otto Wolff von Amerongen. While the American committee consisted of Mr. Johnson, Mr. George Ball, Mr. John H. Ferguson, Mr. H. J. Heinz, Mr. George Nebolsine, and Mr. Dean Rusk.

From the very beginning, Bilderberg was insistent upon censoring the media, withholding the names of the attendees from the public, and to officially conduct themselves unofficially. In the years to come though, they would make exceptions for some reporters to attend which is nothing more then controlling the opposition.



Bilderberg Tax Returns Exposed

American Friends of Bilderberg Inc

Actual pic of Bilderberg’s 2007 tax return.

May 15, 2012 UPDATE: Back a few days ago Tyranny Watch wrote a short article on the breaking news concerning the tax returns of the Bilderberg group. Since then we have had to replace the article due to incorrect facts. Early on May 10th Mark Dice posted on his Twitter account these two statements:

Mike Dice Twitter anouncement

As you read his various tweets that same day on the subject of the Bilderberg tax returns, the reader may get the impression that Dice is the one that broke the story and exposed the documents. On his website it says, “Well, the IRS requires 501c3 Tax Exempt Foundations to make certain records public. I guess you just have to know where to look.” The last sentence implies that he scoured the public records of the IRS to uncover any financial documentation of the Bilderberg group. Later on that day, Dice posted a video on his YouTube channel:

Chicago Prepares for Terror Plot


“You never let a serious crisis go to waste.”

As the NATO Summit on May 20-21 approaches in Chicago, we see a heightened sense of paranoia being pushed upon the people of the Windy City. With the recent announcement by the Obama administration that the war on terror is over, a new threat is emerging – citizen terrorists.

The Chicago NATO host committee is not divulging much information but it appears they are preparing for riots and acts of violence to break out by protestors. There are reports of security forces in full armored gear that will be standing guard around federal buildings in the Loop as the date draws near. The Emanuel administration has also put up bids for training aids and new riot gear for horses. According to Mike Shields, president of the Fraternal Order of Police, in addition to new high impact gear for horses they also purchased about 3,000 protective face shields to guard against human waste or flammable liquids being pelted at the officers.

According to the Red Cross, there are plans for a mass evacuation of the downtown area if such an event occurs. Although the Secret Service is denying such a plan, the Milwaukee branch, confirms in a memo that the Summit “may create unrest or another national security incident. The American Red Cross in southeastern Wisconsin has been asked to place a number of shelters on standby in the event of evacuation of Chicago.” The chapter spokesperson of the Red Cross in Milwaukee confirmed that this plan was not there own but the product of the city of Chicago and the Secret Service.

This is not the only measure that is taking place during the globalist Summit. Starting on the 19th a no-fly zone will also be imposed for the downtown area with another 10-30 mile ring around the perimeter. To add to the fear factor they have given the order “shoot-to-kill” to any unauthorized aircrafts. Last February Vislink confirmed that they would be equipping both air and ground vehicles with new surveillance gear to monitor the public. Furthermore, USPS on the 13th will implement a safety tactic by removing their mail collection boxes within the downtown area, McCormick Place, and the scheduled protest route.


False Premise of the Debunkers


It never ceases to amaze me the lengths people will go to deny or explain away documentation when it comes to factual conspiracies. No, I do not mean the ones made up from the minds of mentally disturbed people or the disinfo agents that spread garbage throughout the truth movement. Of course, these types of fables serve only to have us chasing our proverbial tails while the real agenda moves forward.

Many of the “Debunkers” these days create a strawman, misrepresent other’s beliefs, or simply build their arguments against a false premise. A standard example a reader might see on a skeptical website is the one rejecting the conspiracy of a New World Order based on the Bible having a similar concept. The skeptics hardly ever lay out their argument in this manner but if they did, it would look something like this:

  • The concept of a New World Order is similar to the description of the totalitarian system described in the books of Daniel and Revelation.
  • The Bible is a manmade document full of Jewish legends and traditions.
  • Therefore, since the Bible is a work of fiction a New World Order must also be a myth.

Obviously, this logic is false on many levels. Without addressing the issue of religion and faith, we know concepts can still be true despite whether one believes the whole narrative of a story or not. We have modern examples of this within books and movies that are labeled under the genre historical fiction. Did the movie Valkyrie represent the conspiracy against Hitler relatively accurate? Yes, we actually have a good amount of documentation from the July 20 plot that had been investigated by the Gestapo. The point is one does not have to believe that the Bible is authentic to grasp truth from it. This same principle could be applied to one who rejects a message based on who is delivering these facts.

To dismiss a New World Order based on ones rejection of a certain text is not only biased but shows a lack of studiousness. One cannot wave a magical wand over the mounds of evidence that proves a concerted effort to build a global system of governance. A simple search on globalism or quotes from political figures on a New World Order is a good place to start. A more advanced search into documents, bills, and executive orders scattered throughout the decades weave together the quilt that forms a New World Order. Therefore, the next time somebody approaches the reader with claims of debunking certain ideas or individuals ask yourself these few questions:

  • Are they constructing a strawman argument?
  • Are they representing the opposition’s arguments accurately?
  • Are they basing their conclusion on a faulty premise?

If they have erred in one or more of the above questions, a person in good faith cannot accept their answer to the problem. Let us then remember that truth seekers must also hold ourselves to a higher standard. However, if discernment and wisdom are not used we may very well find ourselves on the side of a hoax.

Matrix of Terms: False Left-Right Paradigm

Two Sides of the Same Coin

Our first entry in the Matrix of Terms Series we will define what a false left-right paradigm is. In order to understand what this false paradigm is we must comprehend how a true paradigm is defined.

According to anthropology and political science, a left-right paradigm is a natural gravitation in society for people to divide into ideological opposites. A major proponent of this theory is a social anthropologist named Rodney Needham from Britain who believed that this was a basic human device. One can do further study into this subject with Needham’s 1973 work “Right and Left: Essays in Dual Symbolic Classification” (University of Chicago).

A false left-right paradigm is essentially two opposing groups who give the illusion of hopelessly polarizing worldviews but in reality, they share common goals in the overall scope of things (such as the direction of our country towards a global system). Usually these groups disagree on smaller divisive matters, which maybe real, to manipulate and rally the public behind one side or the other. The basic idea behind this practice is to keep people divided, powerless, and to maintain overall influence within their sphere. The Roman Empire was experts at this tool and although they no longer physically rule, their concepts still live. The false paradigm masterfully uses important issues like abortion, gay marriage, entitlement programs, etc. to distract the masses while they bulldoze bills, executive orders, contracts, etc. that usually constrict our freedom and destroy the sovereignty of our country.

The groups that use this tactic also are funded or influenced by many of the same organizations and institutions. It should be no surprise then, when one looks at former associations, donations, and other forms of support we find international financiers, corporations, etc. either running these groups or being benefitted in some way by them. A good example of this is in the European political system we see former Goldman-Sachs officials filling in positions of unelected power to help fix the financial crisis they helped create. The same example is true in America. Goldman-Sachs, J.P. Morgan, and people from the Federal Reserve fill in positions of authority. A simple investigation of presidential appointments within various administrations and with whom they surround themselves exposes a gaggle of technocrats and elitists.

The most common examples we see of the false left-right paradigm in Western politics are Democrats vs. Republicans, Liberal vs. Conservative, and as the term suggest Left wing vs. Right wing. Nowhere is the dynamic tension more apparent then what we see in the mainstream news. Many times, we see video clips of congressional debates or talk radio rants criticizing one group over another but once the cameras are gone, the doors are closed, the real nature of their relationships are revealed. A good example of this was the issue of raising the debt ceiling. When no one was quite as concerned about it there was a consensus between the two parties that it would have to happen. However, just as little as five months later the Republicans made a spectacle of it. This was nothing more then a dog and pony show because Harry Reid said earlier, “I want the Republicans to have some buy-in on the debt…They’re going to have a majority in the House. I think they should have some kind of a buy-in on the debt.” So there we have it, they knew they had to do this, they knew the Democrats had taken the dissension last time, and it was the Republicans turn to do the same. The false paradigm performs this same theatrics on any issue they want to steer. One side plays the “good guys” and the other side plays the “bad guys” depending on whose turn it is.

If we were to put forth a concise definition, it might read something like this: “A false left-right paradigm is a political stratagem that uses people’s natural propensity to belong to a like-minded group to drive public opinion and to change policies and laws to benefit their handler’s interests.

Truth is Addictive…

Tyranny Watch Alt Logo

Did you know that Alternative Media is the fastest growing news on the internet? Did you know that Alternative News provides many people daily with stories or reports that most Mainstream outlets ignore or whitewash? Did you know that most Mainstream Media outlets run news according to their financiers? Did you know that it is a common practice for government agencies to work closely with News Networks? If you were unaware of these facts do not feel bad, most are not.

We, at Tyranny Watch, seek to provide solid independent journalism without the shortcomings of being tied to Republican-Democrat agendas or confined into the Left-Right Paradigm. We are about truth, liberty, and preservation of our Republic. We firmly believe in the Constitution and as Amendment I says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the pressNow more than ever we need to excise these freedoms!

Benjamin Franklin once said, “Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.” He must have understood history because this is what governments eventually do when they want to expand power. They put speech restrictions on the population and control access to what information they have. Does any of this sound familiar?

The Alternative Media revolution as it grows has gained more credibility with the induction of freethinkers and lack of state-sponsored propaganda. We are proud of this fact. To further prove the importance of free press, let us examine some news that was covered correctly by independent analysts but were either denied or lied about by Mainstream Media.

Alternative Media

Mainstream Media

Who was Correct?

Fukushima will be uninhabitable for years after nuclear meltdown

Residents of Fukushima will be able to return home soon

Alternative Media

NATO was training and arming rebel groups  which had members of al-Qaeda within it before strike against Libya

Denied it as a conspiracy theory and down-played who was being trained

Alternative Media

Increase in RFID chips in humans

At first denied the existence of the technology then down-played its use for human tracking

Alternative Media

US government was providing guns to the Mexican drug cartels

Media black-out

Alternative Media

Fluoridated water is harmful

Fluoridated water is good

Alternative Media

The Federal Reserve favors big banks and uses political leverage

The Federal Reserve does not show favoritism and is above politics

Alternative Media

Cell phones cause cancer

Denied or down-played links to cancer

Alternative Media

Bisphenol-A (BPA) is linked to infertility

Largely ignored

Alternative Media

TSA naked body scanners cause cancer

Denied facts and said radiation levels are safe

Alternative Media

The government is involved in drug trafficking

Denied it as a conspiracy theory

Alternative Media

NDAA will be used against American citizens

NDAA is not for American citizens

Alternative Media

NDAA will not be vetoed by the president and will be passed quietly

NDAA will be vetoed by the president

Alternative Media

Government has armed unmanned drones both in air and on land

Media black-out

Alternative Media

The fact is there are many more stories that were broke by independent research and journalism. This is why the Alternative Media revolution is so important, when others do not cover important issues we have the freedom speak to unmitigated truth. To be fair, there are people who seek money, fame, and spread disinformation among the Alternative Media circles too. Tyranny Watch is different. We seek to inform the public, set a standard of integrity, inspire peaceful action, and spread the message of freedom for all humanity.

Tyranny Watch also seeks to spread our message through podcasts, radio programming, articles, blogs, vlogs, and special “on the spot” video coverage of live events. We are not limiting ourselves to just stereotypical coverage like who is winning a presidential election. We will cover who the candidates are, what are their connections, suspicious activity during rallies, and voting fraud. We also have specialized news categories that other news outlets are too scared to cover like one world governance, matrix of control, pharmacide, etc.

Tyranny Watch wants to engage the community and insert real issues by promotion of other freedom lovers and production of our own thought-provoking t-shirts, bumper stickers, etc. This also serves to support local business and fund our operations. To be clear, we reject sponsors or local businesses who seek to manipulate our message. Either they want to stand with us or they can simply move on.

Tyranny Watch is also looking for passionate writers, journalists, reporters, and those who specialize in technical areas like graphic design, audio and video production on a voluntary basis. Our ultimate goal is to be able to expand our operation into a fulltime job and pay our staff what they deserve. If you have any questions please contact us by e-mail ( or one of our many social networking accounts on the web.

Founder of Tyranny Watch

Zachary J. Cole